SRBC: Inappropriate Conduct?

  
Leave it to the Sentinel to ferret out the information in his latest post. Based upon my observations over the past few years, this guy:

• hardly sleeps
• is freakin' relentless in his opposition to fracking
• knows more about the environmental "big picture" than most of the local experts combined
• has connections I can't even fathom and that he will never disclose
• will never give up
• and, unfortunately, will probably end up like Karen Silkwood

Can't remember who it was, but someone recently called him a "one man wrecking crew" or something similar. I think that assessment falls a little short. If this guy did his environmental thing full-time, I have zero doubt we would all be in a different place right now.

Too bad.

Getting back to his latest post, I find it interesting that the Susquehanna River Basin Commission chose to change the language on their meeting notice  - with a week to go and little fanfare - to include the term "inappropriate conduct", because these are the same people that are approving just about every water withdrawal application submitted by the natural gas industry or just about anyone else wanting to jump on the Marcellus $hale bandwagon.

Considering the SRBC is facilitating the latest and perhaps greatest environmental rape of the Susquehanna's watershed, who are they to establish standards of  "appropriate conduct"?

I cannot wait for Thursday morning. Freedom of Speech will NEVER be more evident than at that place on that day.

Glory be.